1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 135 Cal.App.3d
  5. 135 Cal.App.3d 428 (1982)
 

ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. 20002.

135 Cal.App.3d 428 (1982)

185 Cal. Rptr. 363

ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; ERNEST EHNISZ et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael H. Remy and Tina A. Thomas for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas F. Olson, Lilian S. Shek and Theodore A. Cobb as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

L.B. Elam, County Counsel, and R.S. Willett, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Hefner, Stark & Marois and Timothy D. Taron for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

The primary question in this appeal is whether respondent Sacramento County Board of Supervisors (Board), in amending its general plan, has complied with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)1 and administrative guidelines (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.). As we conclude that it has not, we shall reverse the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases