1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 134 Cal.App.3d
  5. 134 Cal.App.3d 428 (1982)
 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Docket No. 19994.

134 Cal.App.3d 428 (1982)

184 Cal. Rptr. 648

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Intervener and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 29, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lee B. Elam, County Counsel, Duane C. Miller and Miller & Rolfe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Thomas E. Warriner, Assistant Attorney General, Floyd D. Shimomura and William F. Soo Hoo, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.

John H. Larson, County Counsel, and Daniel D. Mikesell, Jr., Deputy County Counsel, for Intervener and Respondent.

OPINION

BLEASE, J.

In this appeal from a judgment holding the state and various state officials (state) liable to the County of Sacramento (county) for the county's unreimbursed expenditures in administering a state-mandated program of "in-home supportive services" for aged, blind and disabled persons, we are called upon to decide the state's responsibility for funding the program. We hold that the state met its total funding obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases