1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 278 S.C.
  5. 278 S.C. 276 (1982)
 

MATTER OF BARROW

21781

278 S.C. 276 (1982)

294 S.E.2d 785

In the Matter of Arthur Elliott Huger BARROW, Jr., and Arnold Samuel Goodstein, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 24, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod and Senior Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard B. Kale, Jr., Columbia, for complainant.

A. Camden Lewis and John P. Freeman, Columbia, and Morris D. Rosen, Charleston, for respondents.

Aug. 24, 1982.

Per Curiam:

This matter is before the Court for review of the independent recommendations of the Hearing Panel (Panel) and Executive Committee of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (Board) that respondents A. Elliott Barrow, Jr., and Arnold S. Goodstein, both attorneys, be publicly reprimanded because of professional misconduct. One member of the Executive Committee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases