MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC. v. MELAMED

No. 82-603.

425 So.2d 127 (1982)

MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Brian Sheen, Petitioners, v. Helen MELAMED, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied January 31, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett Falk of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, Miami, for petitioner Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

H. Michael Easley of Easley, Massa & Willits, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner Brian Sheen.

F. Kendall Slinkman, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


HURLEY, Judge.

When this case was last before us,1 we held that the substantive portions of the Federal Arbitration Act2 supersede state law and must be enforced by state courts when the prerequisites of the federal act are satisfied.3 As a result, we reversed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and remanded the cause with instructions to reconsider the motion in light...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases