RUDY v. THOMPSON


186 N.J. Super. 359 (1982)

452 A.2d 702

JULIUS RUDY AND EVELYN RUDY, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM R. THOMPSON AND THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 27, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Kessler, attorney for appellants.

Rubenson and Cross, attorneys for respondents (Eugene A. Cross of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MILMED, MORTON I. GREENBERG and FURMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FURMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of no cause for action, which was molded, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.2(c), after a jury verdict that plaintiff Julius Rudy was 60% negligent in proximately causing an accident between a motor vehicle driven by him and a motor vehicle driven by defendant Thompson.

Two conflicting versions of the facts were before the jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases