STATE v. LISELLA


187 Conn. 335 (1982)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DOMENICK LISELLA

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released June 8, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Mac Buckley, for the appellant (defendant).

Ernest J. Diette, Jr., assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were John M. Bailey, state's attorney, and Herbert Appleton, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

SPEZIALE, C. J., PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY and ARMENTANO, Js.


PER CURIAM.

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce relevant evidence in rebuttal which could have been introduced earlier in the state's case and which contradicted the defendant's testimony and other evidence presented by the defense.

After a trial to a jury, the defendant was found guilty of violation of an act relating to dependencyproducing drugs; General Statutes § 19-480 (a); and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases