IN RE SHAW


88 N.J. 433 (1982)

443 A.2d 670

IN THE MATTER OF HARRY L. SHAW, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 25, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Francis J. Hartman argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) considered two presentments filed by the District IV Ethics Committee for Camden and Gloucester Counties (Committee). Those presentments dealt with three areas of alleged misconduct on the part of respondent, Harry L. Shaw, growing out of his representation of clients involved in automobile accidents occurring in 1973 and 1975.

I

The first allegation of ethical misconduct was that respondent unethically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases