1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 293 S.E.2d
  5. 293 S.E.2d 219 (1982)
 

PIEDMONT PLASTICS, INC. v. MIZE CO., INC.

No. 8126SC1142.

293 S.E.2d 219 (1982)

PIEDMONT PLASTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MIZE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, INC., and H-M-T Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 6, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Obenshain, Hinnant, Ellyson, Runkle & Bryant by Alfred S. Bryant, Richmond, for original defendant and third-party plaintiff.

Walker, Palmer & Miller, P. A. by Douglas M. Martin, Charlotte, for defendants.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Third party defendants first contend that a tally sheet showing records of service calls made by third party defendant Southern Agricultural Chemicals for the purpose of replacing defective rollers fell within the business records exception to the hearsay rule, and thus was improperly excluded. We find no error.

Business records are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule if "(1) the entries are made in the regular course of business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases