ROSOVICH v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 16077-PR.

133 Ariz. 374 (1982)

651 P.2d 1199

Jim M. ROSOVICH, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, City of Tucson, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

September 27, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabinovitz & Dix, P.C. by Charles G. Rehling, Tucson, for petitioner.

Calvin Harris, Former Chief Counsel, James A. Overholt, Acting Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, State Compensation Fund by Fred R. Sands, Phoenix, for respondent carrier.


CAMERON, Justice.

We granted the petition of the claimant, Jim M. Rosovich, to review a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the administrative law judge in denying Rosovich's petition to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must determine on appeal whether the administrative law judge abused his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases