PER CURIAM.
At issue is whether a post-judgment order denying attorney's fees to a plaintiff who recovered a judgment against an insurance company as a second beneficiary of a credit life insurance policy is inconsistent with that judgment and should be reversed. We hold that it is.
Appellee chose not to appeal the final judgment entered in behalf of appellant and it is superfluous to comment upon the correctness of the court's earlier decision. The judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
