TRINTER v. ESNA DIVISION


186 N.J. Super. 316 (1982)

452 A.2d 678

ROBERT TRINTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. ESNA DIVISION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Kenny argued the cause for appellant (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).

Otto C. Staubach argued the cause for respondent (Weiner, Staubach, Edelson & Hopmayer, attorneys).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, ANTELL and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

This appeal contests the construction given N.J.S.A. 34:15-12(c)(21) by a judge of the Division of Workers' Compensation — specifically, whether the 30% incremental awards made under that section are limited to amputations of the hand, arm, foot or leg.

Petitioner was injured in the course of his employment with respondent ESNA. A press came down on his right hand and his right second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases