SEXTON v. STATE FARM MUTL. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.

No. 81-1092.

69 Ohio St. 2d 431 (1982)

SEXTON, APPELLEE, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 24, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scanlon & Gearinger Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Timothy F. Scanlon, for appellee.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., Mr. Charles E. Pierson and Mr. Mark D. Frasure, for appellant.


CELEBREZZE, C. J.

The issue presented for our determination is whether the limitations in the uninsured motorist coverage in this policy are valid under R. C. 3937.18. The effect of the policy provisions set forth above is to limit coverage to recovery for bodily injury or death sustained by an insured as defined in the policy.

State Farm contends that its policy limitations are valid and that Sexton can not recover because he was not personally injured and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases