1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 135 Ariz.
  5. 135 Ariz. 358 (1982)
 

ARMSTRONG v. HOOKER

No. 2 CA-CIV 4658.

135 Ariz. 358 (1982)

661 P.2d 208

Herbert W. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Robert J. HOOKER, Judge of the Superior Court in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and Ramona Armstrong, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied February 2, 1983.

Review Denied March 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolfe & Ostapuk, Tucson, Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, Beverly Hills, Cal. by David Wolfe and David Ostapuk, Tucson, and Allan Browne, Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner.

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Harold L. Higgins, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for respondent.

Ettinger & Deckter, P.C. by Louis L. Deckter, Tucson, for real party in interest.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Can an out-of-state plaintiff be compelled to attend court proceedings within the state by order of the court? This is the issue to be decided by this special action. Since the trial court's order compelling attendance was an interlocutory, non-appealable order, see A.R.S. § 12-2101, a special action is an appropriate vehicle for review of the trial court's order. Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa County,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases