MANHATTAN LIFE INS. v. LACY J. MILLER MACH.

No. 8122SC1319.

298 S.E.2d 190 (1982)

MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LACY J. MILLER MACHINE COMPANY, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 21, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cansler, Lockhart, Parker & Young, P.A. by Thomas Ashe Lockhart and George K. Evans, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Wilson, Biesecker, Tripp & Sink by Joe E. Biesecker, Lexington, and House, Blanco & Osborn, P.A. by Lawrence U. McGee, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.


BECTON, Judge.

I

The purpose of summary judgment is to "pierce" the pleadings and determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists. Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 464, 186 S.E.2d 400, 403 (1972). Should there exist any issue of material fact, the reviewing court must deny the motion. Id.

The Miller Company first argues that there is a material factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases