MICHALKO v. COOKE COLOR & CHEM. CORP.


91 N.J. 386 (1982)

451 A.2d 179

ELEANOR J. MICHALKO AND PAUL MICHALKO, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. COOKE COLOR AND CHEMICAL CORP. A/K/A COOKE DIVISION OF REICHOLD CHEMICALS CORP., SQUARE D COMPANY, AND E DISTRIBUTION COMPANY (FICTITIOUS NAME), DEFENDANTS, AND CUBBY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 16, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas S. Brierley argued the cause for appellants (Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys; William R. Albrecht, of counsel).

Donald S. McCord, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (O'Donnell, McCord & Leslie, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

This case presents the question whether an independent contractor that rebuilds part of a machine according to the specifications of the owner can be held strictly liable for injuries sustained by a foreseeable user of the machine when the contractor failed to make the machine safe or to warn of the dangers inherent in its use. The courts below found that such a contractor could not be held strictly liable. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases