VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant Whitt brings forth two assignments of error. His first argument is that the larceny conviction impermissibly rests on an inference drawn from recent possession stacked upon an inference that he possessed the property.
The possession of recently stolen property raises a presumption of the possessor's guilt of larceny of the property. State v. Eppley,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
