Per Curiam.
In Columbus Bar Assn. v. Tuttle (1975),
"As the Supreme Court of California so cogently stated, `The rule against commingling "was adopted to provide against the probability in some cases, the possibility in many cases, and the danger in all cases that such commingling will result in the loss of clients' money."' Clark v. State...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.