OPPENHEIM v. CIRCUIT COURT OF ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Nos. 55461, 55474 cons.

91 Ill.2d 336 (1982)

MARY G. OPPENHEIM, Petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT et al., Respondents. — CHARLOTTE HAMMOND, Petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed June 18, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay A. Canel, Leroy G. Inskeep, and David G. Lynch, of Rudnick & Wolfe, of Chicago, for petitioner Mary G. Oppenheim.

James Walker, Ltd., of Bloomington, and William Van Hagey, of Chadwell, Kayser, Ruggles, McGee & Hastings, of Chicago, for petitioner Charlotte Hammond.

Patrick W. O'Brien, Michael J. O'Rourke, John M. Heaphy, and Hope G. Nightingale, of Mayer, Brown & Platt, of Chicago, for respondent Max E. Meyer.

Gerald D. Mindell, of Chicago, for respondent Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago.


Writs denied; supervisory order entered.

JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court:

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 381 (73 Ill.2d R. 381) we allowed two motions for leave to file original petitions for writs of prohibition or mandamus or for the exercise of this court's supervisory authority, and consolidated the actions. In cause No. 55461, Mary G. Oppenheim, liquidating receiver (the receiver), as petitioner, named as respondents the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases