This case again confronts us with the vexatious problem of when and whether the police may be justified in relying upon hearsay evidence supplied by a confidential informer whose reliability has been established to effect a warrantless search. The suppression court was of the opinion that the stop and search of defendant was not constitutionally justified and suppressed the evidence seized. We disagree. Accordingly, we reverse and deny the motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
