LONG v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE

No. 132A81.

293 S.E.2d 101 (1982)

Charles G. LONG, Jr. and wife, Mary P. Long v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Groves, Bigger, Jonas & Campbell, P. A. by T. LaFontine Odom and L. Holmes Eleazer, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Caudle, Underwood & Kinsey, P. A. by William E. Underwood, Jr., and C. Ralph Kinsey, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.


MEYER, Justice.

The major issue brought forward for review is the permissible scope of relief sought by the petitioners for alleged injuries and damages to their persons and property. More specifically, the issue is whether plaintiffs in addition to recovering for the diminution in the value of their real property upon the theory of inverse condemnation, may recover (1) for personal injuries and property damages resulting from direct overflights upon allegations sounding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases