1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 88 N.J.
  5. 88 N.J. 304 (1982)
 

CITY OF CAMDEN v. SKOKOWSKI

88 N.J. 304 (1982)

441 A.2d 741

CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT, v. BARRY SKOKOWSKI, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND THE LOCAL FINANCE BOARD, APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 3, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel P. Reynolds, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants (James R. Zazzali, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Laurence E. Rosoff, City Attorney, argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

The problem here, as in Passaic v. Local Finance Board, 88 N.J. 293 (1982), decided this day, involves the propriety of an emergency appropriation by a municipality under N.J.S.A. 40A:4-46.

Camden is one of the older urban areas in the State and is afflicted with the ills typical of these centers. Its unemployment rate generally averages two or three times...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases