GROCOTT v. EWING TP.


187 N.J. Super. 182 (1982)

453 A.2d 1363

WILLIAM GROCOTT AND PETER DEVLIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF EWING AND CALVIN STEEPY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 10, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Farkas argued the cause for the appellants (Marinari & Farkas, P.A., attorneys).

Charles P. Allen, Jr. argued the cause for the respondents (Dietrich, Allen & St. John, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, J.H. COLEMAN and GAULKIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.

William Grocott and Peter Devlin are police officers in the employ of defendant Township of Ewing. They instituted this action seeking to tack benefits under N.J.S.A. 40A:9-5 based upon prior employment in county government. They concede the statute was declared unconstitutional in the case of Kenney v. East Brunswick Tp., 172 N.J.Super. 45 (App.Div...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases