1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 132 Cal.App.3d
  5. 132 Cal.App.3d 203 (1982)
 

STOCKTON METRO. TRANSIT v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT

Docket No. 19766.

132 Cal.App.3d 203 (1982)

183 Cal. Rptr. 24

STOCKTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 276, AFL-CIO, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent; BOB D. AUSTIN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 25, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wilson & Hoslett, John A. Wilson and David P. Whitridge for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Neyhart, Anderson, Nussbaum, Reilly & Freitas and Stanley Neyhart for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent and for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

PHILLIPS, J.*

Plaintiff and cross-defendant Stockton Metropolitan Transit District (SMTD) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County compelling it to arbitrate a controversy arising between it and defendant and cross-complainant Local 276 of the Amalgamated Transit Union (Union), over proposed changes in the SMTD retirement plan. The judgment also denied SMTD's motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases