DOROFEE v. PENNSAUKEN TP. PLANNING BD.


187 N.J. Super. 141 (1982)

453 A.2d 1341

HARRY DOROFEE AND ELLEN M. DOROFEE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, JOHN TOCCO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PIETRO TOCCO AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, HELEN TOCCO, FRED TOCCO AND ABAL BUILDERS, INC., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 27, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Strazzullo argued the cause for appellant (John F. Strazzullo, P.A., attorney).

John Tocco, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

No appearances on behalf of respondents Harry Dorofee and Ellen M. Dorofee.

Before Judges BISCHOFF, J.H. COLEMAN and GAULKIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Defendant Planning Board of the Township of Pennsauken (Planning Board) was granted final judgment in its favor on its cross-claim against defendant John Tocco (Tocco). The judgment declared, however, "no damages sustained." The Planning Board appeals.

The action was brought by plaintiffs Harry and Ellen M. Dorofee seeking damages and other relief arising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases