BOMSER v. MOYLE


89 A.D.2d 202 (1982)

Alan H. Bomser, Appellant, v. Allan Moyle, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 26, 1982


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellen G. Zindler of counsel (Swetnick, Rosenblum & Zindler, attorneys), for appellant.

Daniel J. Kornstein of counsel (Kornstein Meister & Veisz, attorneys), for respondent.

MURPHY, P. J., KUPFERMAN, MARKEWICH and LYNCH, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The appeal from the order dismissing the original complaint must be dismissed as moot since an amended complaint was served. Nonetheless, for purposes of background, a brief discussion will be had of that original complaint.

In the original complaint, plaintiff Bomser sought to recover from defendant Moyle upon a written finder's agreement. It was the plaintiff's contention that an "undated document" sent to him by the defendant constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases