PA. CABLE TV. ASSOC. v. PA. P.U.C.

Nos. 1334 C.D. 1981 and 1433 C.D. 1981.

68 Pa.Commw. 187 (1982)

Pennsylvania Cable Television Association et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company et al., Intervenors. Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. and Titusville Cable TV, Inc., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. Pennsylvania Cable Television Association et al., Intervenors.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

August 6, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Riehl, with him Robert H. Griswold, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, for petitioners, Pennsylvania Cable Television Association et al.

Yolanda G. Barco, with her George J. Barco, Barco and Barco, for petitioners, Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. and Titusville Cable TV, Inc.

Robert A. Christianson, Assistant Counsel, with him Alfred N. Lowenstein, Deputy Chief Counsel, and Joseph J. Malatesta, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

John Antonuk, for Intervenor, Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

Edward G. Bauer, Jr., with him Eugene J. Bradley and Edward J. Cullen, Jr., for intervenor, Philadelphia Electric Company.

Walter A. Boquist, for intervenor, Metropolitan Edison Co.

Richard A. Flati, for intervenor, Pennsylvania Electric Assn.

Donald F. Clarke, with him Karen Kress Weisbord, for intervenor, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania.

Jack F. Aschinger, Thomas & Thomas, for intervenors, Denver and Ephrata Telephone and Telegraph Company; Mid-Penn Telephone Corporation; North Pittsburgh Telephone Company, and Pennsylvania Independent Telephone Association.

Argued February 2, 1982, before President Judge CRUMLISH and Judges ROGERS, WILLIAMS, JR., MacPHAIL and DOYLE.


OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE CRUMLISH, JR., August 6, 1982:

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, respondent, and intervenors1 have filed motions to quash the appeal2 of Pennsylvania Cable Television Association and other petitioners.3 The motion is granted.

This action was brought within our appellate jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases