BUSCHLEN v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Docket No. 66128.

121 Mich. App. 113 (1982)

328 N.W.2d 592

BUSCHLEN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philo, Atkinson, Darling, Steinberg, Harper & Edwards (by Harry M. Philo and Richard L. Steinberg), for plaintiffs.

Martin, Bacon & Martin, P.C. (by James N. Martin and Paul R. Van Tol), for defendant.

Harvey, Kruse, Western & Mylan, P.C. (by John A. Kruse and Michael F. Schmidt), for Ford Motor Company.

Before: R.M. MAHER, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and M.J. KELLY, JJ.


ON REMAND

M.J. KELLY, J.

We reconsider this case on remand from the Supreme Court, in light of that Court's holding in Fredericks v General Motors Corp, 411 Mich. 712; 311 N.W.2d 725 (1981).

Active Tool & Manufacturing Company designed, constructed, and sold machine tooling dies to Ford Motor Company. An affiliate of Active, Sebewaing Industries, Inc., used the dies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases