We are substantially in agreement with the statement of the facts set forth by Justice BLOOM in his dissent, as we are with his conclusions on matters other than whether a prima facie case of a conspiracy to commit criminal usury was established. We find that the prosecution never established, prima facie, the existence of that conspiracy without recourse to the challenged statements. Therefore, the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ARDITO
86 A.D.2d 144 (1982)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Gregory Ardito, Defendant-Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 15, 1982
April 15, 1982
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
SULLIVAN, J. P., and SILVERMAN, J., concur with CARRO, J.; ROSS and BLOOM, JJ., dissent in an opinion by BLOOM, J.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.