SUSTIN v. FEE

No. 81-328.

69 Ohio St. 2d 143 (1982)

SUSTIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FEE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 10, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan Co., L.P.A., Mr. Dale H. Markowitz and Mr. David M. Ondrey, for appellants.

Messrs. Andrews & Todoroff and Mr. J. Melvin Andrews, for appellee.


HOLMES, J.

The gravamen of appellants' complaint is that appellee's action was a tortious intrusion upon their right of seclusion. In the leading case of Housh v. Peth (1956), 165 Ohio St. 35, this court recognized a cause of action for invasion of privacy based upon the wrongful intrusion upon a person's seclusion. In so doing, this court held, at paragraphs one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases