1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 643 P.2d
  5. 643 P.2d 1300 (1982)
 

SCHAFFER v. SCHAFFER

No. 100-714; CA A22032.

643 P.2d 1300 (1982)

57 Or.App. 43

Harvey A. SCHAFFER, Appellant, v. Imogene E. SCHAFFER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann Aiken, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Sahlstrom & Dugdale, Eugene.

Hale G. Thompson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thompson, Mumford, Anderson & Fisher, Eugene.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

THORNTON, Judge.

Husband appeals the denial of his motion, pursuant to ORS 107.407,1 to terminate spousal support. Wife presented evidence that the original dissolution decree did not provide for spousal support but, instead, provided for a division of property and could not be terminated. We find that husband's monthly obligation is part of a property division and thus not subject to termination under ORS 107.407.

The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases