HEINRICH v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO.

Civ. A. No. M-80-1956.

532 F.Supp. 1348 (1982)

Paul P. HEINRICH and Eva Rae Heinrich, his wife v. The GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

February 25, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin H. Freeman and Bulman, Dunie, Freeman, Burke & Feld, Bethesda, Md., and Sylvan H. Sack, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiffs.

Benjamin R. Civiletti and James K. Archibald and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

The defendant, the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear), has moved to dismiss certain aspects of the plaintiffs' amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) & (7), Fed.R.Civ.P.1 The plaintiffs have filed a memorandum opposing Goodyear's motion,2 and the court heard argument from counsel on February 5, 1982. For the reasons set out...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases