HAFER v. ANACONDA ALUMINUM CO.

No. 81-188.

643 P.2d 1192 (1982)

Kerby K. HAFER, Claimant and Appellant, v. ANACONDA ALUMINUM COMPANY, Employer, and Anaconda Aluminum Company, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided April 29, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hoyt & Trieweiler, Whitefish, Terry N. Trieweiler, argued, Whitefish, for claimant and appellant.

Utick & Grosfield, Helena, Norman Grosfield, argued, Helena, for defendant and respondent.


WEBER, Justice.

Claimant Kerry Hafer (Hafer) appeals from the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Court. Hafer questions the method used by the court to compute his award. He presents the following issues for review:

(1) Whether there was substantial evidence to support the hearing examiner's finding that Hafer's injury affects only his elbow, rather than his whole arm.

(2) Whether the limitations of 39...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases