1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 537 F.Supp.
  5. 537 F.Supp. 1282 (1982)
 

McDONALD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

Civ. No. 4-79-189.

537 F.Supp. 1282 (1982)

Stanley McDONALD, Norman R. Hagfors and Clayton Jensen, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

April 14, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett by Daniel R. Shulman and John Q. McShane, Minneapolis, Minn., and Alioto & Alioto by Joseph M. Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Maslon, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty by Charles Quaintance, Jr., Minneapolis, Minn., Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler by David F. Dobbins and Theodore B. Van Itallie, Jr., New York City, and James E. Farrell, Jr., Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, N. J., for defendants.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. EVIDENCE

III. THE DEFENDANT'S CLAIMED BASES OF RELIEF

IV. DISCUSSION

A. PLAINTIFFS' STANDING TO RECOVER FOR ANTITRUST VIOLATIONS B. THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION OF THE SHERMAN ACT C. THE SHERMAN ACT CLAIMS 1. Section 1 (a) Sufficiency of the Evidence to Establish a Suppression of the TENS Industry (b) Concerted Action (c) Sherman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases