1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 87 A.D.2d
  5. 87 A.D.2d 92 (1982)
 

MATTER OF BERGER

87 A.D.2d 92 (1982)

In the Matter of Edward B. Berger, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 17, 1982

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Diana L. Maxfield of counsel), for petitioner.

Edward B. Berger, respondent pro se.

MOLLEN, P. J., DAMIANI, TITONE, LAZER and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 16, 1959. The respondent was suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona, effective December 7, 1981 through June 7, 1982.

Generally stated, the respondent was found guilty of presenting misleading time records, charging a clearly excessive fee, and charging an unearned fee of $10,000, all in violation of the Disciplinary Rules in effect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases