Petitioners (hereafter plaintiffs) seek a writ of mandate to command respondent court to grant their motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. Their petition presents the question whether the rule announced in Taylor v. Superior Court (1979)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PETERSON v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. L.A. 31439.
31 Cal.3d 147 (1982)
642 P.2d 1305
181 Cal. Rptr. 784
DONALD R. PETERSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA COUNTY, Respondent; NORMAN THOMPSON, Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 8, 1982.
April 8, 1982.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Heily, Blase & Ellison, Heily, Blase, Ellison & Wellcome and Jay H. Sorensen for Petitioners.
Leonard Sacks, Harvey R. Levine, Edward I. Pollock, Robert E. Cartwright, William M. Shernoff, Stephen I. Zetterberg, Sanford M. Gage, Arne Werchick, Ian Herzog, Glen T. Bashore, Wylie Aitken, Victoria J. De Goff and James R. McGrath as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
Archbald & Spray, Robert F. Harris and Heather Scott Cissna for Real Party in Interest.
Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley & Jennett, Patrick A. Mesisca, Jr., Clifford H. Woosley and Peter J. Godfrey as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
