PER CURIAM:
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for criminal contempt. He claims the evidence does not show beyond a reasonable doubt that he willfully and deliberately failed to appear at a status hearing on July 15, 1981.
The offense of criminal contempt consists of a willful attempt to show disrespect for the court or to disrupt the proceedings. In re Gorfkle, D.C...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.