UNITED STATES v. FRISK

No. 80-4583.

675 F.2d 1079 (1982)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard M. FRISK, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 30, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Frisk, Walnut Creek, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harold Burton Jenkins, Washington D. C., argued, for plaintiff-appellee; Michael D'Amelio, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Before FARRIS, FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Richard M. Frisk, the co-obligor on his son's federally insured student loan, defaulted along with his son on the note. Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Insured Student Loan Program, the lending institution assigned the note to the United States and the Government discharged Frisk's obligation. The Government brought suit on the note and Frisk defended by alleging that the suit was barred by the applicable six-year statute of limitations. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases