1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 654 P.2d
  5. 654 P.2d 1092 (1982)
 

AMFAC FOODS, INC. v. INTERN. SYSTEMS, ETC.

CA 16706; SC 28071.

654 P.2d 1092 (1982)

294 Or. 94

AMFAC FOODS, INC., Dba Lamb-Weston, Respondent On Review, v. INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS & CONTROLS CORPORATION AND FLODIN, Inc., Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 23, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Arnold, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were Johnson, Harrang & Swanson, Eugene, and V. Thomas Lankford, Jr., and Sharp, Randolph & Green, Washington, D.C. On the briefs were Walter J. Cosgrave, and Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley & Lagesen, Portland.

Thomas S. Moore, Portland, argued the cause and filed a petition for respondent on review. With him on the brief were William H. Morrison, and Morrison, Dunn, Cohen, Miller & Carney, Portland.

PETERSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Amfac Foods, Inc. (Amfac) brought this action to recover damages it allegedly incurred as a result of defendants' breach of contract. From a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor, defendants appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 52 Or.App. 907, 630 P.2d 868 (1981). This case involves, inter alia, the question whether a corporate shareholder, by exercising control...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases