FROCK v. UNITED STATES R. R. RETIREMENT BD.

Nos. 81-2187, 81-2637.

685 F.2d 1041 (1982)

Clinton T. FROCK and Charles L. Stribling, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 6, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newton G. McCoy, Friedman, Weitzman & Friedman, P.C., St. Louis, Mo., Gill DeFord, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

Thomas W. Sadler, U. S. R. R. Retirement Bd., Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

Before SPRECHER and BAUER, Circuit Judges, and BONSAL, Senior District Judge.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

These petitions involve the applicability of section 3(h)(6) of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 231b(h)(6), to railroad workers applying for dual benefits following this court's decision in Gebbie v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 631 F.2d 512 (7th Cir. 1980), and the constitutionality of that section if it is applied to these workers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases