SEMINOLE COUNTY v. MERTZ

No. 81-1115.

415 So.2d 1286 (1982)

SEMINOLE COUNTY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Harold E. MERTZ and Esther M. Mertz, His Wife; the Huskey Company, a Florida Corporation; and Magnolia Service Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton A. McClelland, Jr., of Nabors, Potter, McClelland, Griffith & Jones, P.A., Melbourne, and Nikki Clayton, Seminole County Atty., Sanford, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Harlan Tuck of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for appellee/cross-appellant Magnolia Service Corp.

Michael J. Sheahan of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Winter Park, for appellee/cross-appellant The Huskey Co.

Emery H. Rosenbluth, Jr., of Subin, Shams, Rosenbluth & Moran, P.A., Orlando, for appellees/cross-appellants Harold E. Mertz and Esther M. Mertz.


COBB, Judge.

Seminole County and Magnolia Service Corporation1 appeal the granting of a permanent injunction prohibiting the flow of surface water onto appellees' lands. We affirm. For reasons that will be discussed, Magnolia's appeal of the dismissal of its counterclaim is denied.

Harold and Esther Mertz (Mertz), appellees herein, filed a complaint in March, 1978, in the Circuit Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases