1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 640 P.2d
  5. 640 P.2d 1037 (1982)
 

FRIEDMAN v. MT. VILLAGE, INC.

No. A7610-15207; CA 18323.

640 P.2d 1037 (1982)

55 Or.App. 1018

Rodney FRIEDMAN and Robert Fisher, Co-Partners, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Fisher-Friedman Associates, Appellants, v. MT. VILLAGE, INC., a Corporation, Aka High Village, Inc., Far West Federal Savings & Loan Association, Robert Bocek and Ruth Bocek, Husband and Wife, Roy Grundeland, Kerry S. Gilbert and Paul E. Christensen, Gilco Investment Partnership; Ted K. Gilbert; Property Management Services, Inc., and Dave Christensen, Inc., Respondents, and Kerry S. Gilbert and Paul E. Christensen, Cross-Plaintiffs, v. Mt. Village, Inc., a Corporation, Aka High Village, Inc., and Robert Bocek, Cross-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 8, 1982.

Reconsideration Denied March 23, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Birenbaum, San Francisco, Cal., argued the cause for appellants. With him on the reply brief was Paul D. Karasoff, San Francisco, Cal.

Henry L. Bauer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Far West Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'n. With him on the brief was Bauer, Murphy, Winfree & Schaub, P.C., Portland.

Thomas S. Moore, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Robert and Ruth Bocek, Mt. Village, Inc., and Roy Grundeland. With him on the brief was Richard Maizels, Portland.

Frederick T. Smith, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Kerry S. Gilbert and Paul E. Christensen. With him on the brief was David D. Park, Portland.

Gary I. Grenley, Portland, waived appearance for respondents Gilco Investment Partnership, Ted K. Gilbert, Property Management Services, Inc., and Dave Christensen, Inc.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., WARREN, J., and HOLMAN, Senior Judge.

HOLMAN, Senior Judge.

This is a proceeding by which plaintiffs, a firm of architects, seek recovery on numerous contract and tort theories, arising out of the furnishing of architectural services. Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendants.

On June 11, 1973, plaintiffs, residents of California, entered into a contract with an Arizona company to draw plans for a planned residential development on a specific piece of property in the city of Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases