1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 134 Ariz.
  5. 134 Ariz. 25 (1982)
 

SCHEYTT v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

No. 1 CA-IC 2644.

134 Ariz. 25 (1982)

653 P.2d 375

Elfreada N. SCHEYTT, Petitioner Employee, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Southwest Vacuum Devices, Inc. of Tucson, Respondent Employer, Mission Insurance Company, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, Department C.

Rehearing Denied October 6, 1982.

Review Denied October 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tretschok, McNamara & Clymer, P.C. by Dale D. Tretschok, Tucson, for petitioner.

Everett, Bury & Moeller, P.C. by J. Michael Moeller, Tucson, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.

James A. Overholt, Acting Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent, Indus. Com'n of Ariz.

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The dispositive issue in this review of a workman's compensation award is the petitioning employee's contention that the administrative law judge committed error in refusing to give her the opportunity to cross-examine two medical experts whose report constituted a substantial part of the basis for the judge's award.

Pursuant to the request of the petitioning employee (claimant), a hearing had been scheduled to determine whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases