KEITH v. BARROW-HICKS EXTENSIONS, ETC.

No. 81-178.

626 S.W.2d 951 (1982)

Roy KEITH, Collector of Pulaski County, Arkansas, et al., Appellants, v. BARROW-HICKS EXTENSIONS OF WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 OF PULASKI COUNTY, Arkansas, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

January 25, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur C. "Dub" Bentley, Pros. Atty., by Hugh L. Brown and Steven L. Curry, Deputy Pros. Attys., Little Rock, for appellants.

Townsend & Townsend, Ltd., by Willis Townsend, Little Rock, for appellees.


DUDLEY, Justice.

Appellees, sixteen improvement districts comprised of drainage districts, municipal improvement districts and suburban improvement districts, sought a declaratory judgment, a mandatory injunction and damages against appellants, the collector and treasurer of Pulaski County, for withholding ten percent of the combined assessment and penalty or fee on delinquent property located within the various districts. One of the prayers for relief asked for a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases