1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 665 F.2d
  5. 665 F.2d 906 (1982)
 

MILENS OF CALIFORNIA v. RICHMOND DEVELOP. AGENCY

No. 80-4081.

665 F.2d 906 (1982)

MILENS OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 11, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald J. Mulcare, San Mateo, Cal., argued, for defendant-appellee; Turner, Mulcare & Whitaker, San Mateo, Cal., Bold & Polisner, Walnut Creek, Cal., on brief.

Herman H. Fitzgerald, Burlingame, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Before DUNIWAY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Richmond Redevelopment Agency appeals from the decision of the district court that it took Milens' land by inverse condemnation and must pay just compensation. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. The Facts.

In 1966 the City of Richmond approved the Richmond Redevelopment Agency's redevelopment project 10-A (downtown Richmond). The plan divided property into two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases