1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 629 S.W.2d
  5. 629 S.W.2d 880 (1982)
 

BEAVER v. SKINNER

No. 17677.

629 S.W.2d 880 (1982)

Oscar M. BEAVER, et ux., Appellants, v. A. O. SKINNER, Individually and d/b/a Skinner's Screen Shop, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

March 3, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Buckner, Mary P. Beeman, Buckner Law Offices, Georgetown, for appellants.

Jim D. Hughes, Law Offices of Jim D. Hughes, Georgetown, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have moved this Court to extend the time for filing an appeal bond with the district clerk of Williamson County. Appellee has responded in opposition to the motion to extend. This Court will overrule the motion to extend.

The question before the Court concerns the interpretation given the phrase "reasonably explaining the need," as employed by Tex.R.Civ.P. 356(b), as amended in 1981, within the context of motions for extensions of time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases