SHOCKEY v. HARDEN INS. AGENCY, INC.

No. 12372.

643 P.2d 849 (1982)

H. Carl SHOCKEY and Helen Shockey, Appellants, v. HARDEN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

April 20, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Peter Lee, Vincent Ochoa, Richard McKnight and James C. Mahan, Las Vegas, for appellants.

Rogers, Monsey, Woodbury & Berggreen, and Douglas G. Crosby, Las Vegas, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The district court granted respondent, Harden Insurance Agency's, motion for summary judgment, and ordered appellants Carl and Helen Shockey to return a stock certificate for 720 shares of Harden Insurance Agency stock. The Shockeys contend there are genuine issues of material fact which render the district court's order of summary judgment inappropriate.

In April of 1972, Carl Shockey began his employment as vice-president of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases