Per Curiam.
The evidence indicates that, with respect to Count I, respondent did not act for personal gain. It is also evident that respondent did perform certain legal work, although in a somewhat dilatory fashion. It is, however, a fundamental tenet of the professional responsibility of a lawyer "that he should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.