PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a conviction, after trial by jury, of driving while intoxicated in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2). Defendant's sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.
In passing on the denial of a V.R. Cr.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal, we are required to review the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Driscoll, 137 Vt. 89, 100,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.