ELSER v. I. A. M. NAT. PENSION FUND

Nos. 80-6095, 81-5024.

684 F.2d 648 (1982)

Madge H. ELSER and Margaret E. Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. I. A. M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 20, 1982.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied November 10, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Simpson, Rose, Klein & Marias, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant and cross-appellee.

Robert D. Vogel, Pappy, Kaplon & Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees and cross-appellant.

Before HAYNSWORTH and CHOY, Circuit Judges and JAMESON, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 10, 1982.

JAMESON, Senior District Judge:

Defendant-appellant, I. A. M. National Pension Fund, has appealed from a judgment holding that the Fund's cancellation provisions are arbitrary and capricious and that plaintiffs-appellees, Madge H. Elser and Margaret C. Thomas, and others similarly situated, were improperly denied pensions.

I. Factual Background

The Fund operates a multiemployer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases