1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 640 P.2d
  5. 640 P.2d 656 (1982)
 

FUJIMOTO v. CITY OF HAPPY VALLEY

LUBA No. 80-111; CA A20400.

640 P.2d 656 (1982)

55 Or.App. 905

Mas FUJIMOTO, Delmer Eisert, Robert and Agnes Guy, Respondents, v. CITY OF HAPPY VALLEY, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 8, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Carskadon, Jr., Milwaukie, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Redman, Carskadon, Knauss & Kelley, Milwaukie.

Terry D. Morgan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Morgan & Shonkwiler, P.C., Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN, J.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner, City of Happy Valley (Happy Valley), seeks judicial review of a determination by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that its comprehensive plan violates Statewide Planning Goal 2, in that it fails to provide for a residential development density equal to that said to have been assumed in the establishment of Metropolitan Service District's (Metro) Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).

In January, 1980, the Land Conservation and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases